Hollister v Soetoro interpleader denied

February 5, 2009

Hollister v Soetoro

Civil Action No. 08-2254

Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is  DENIED.

His motion to shorten time for the defendants to respond to his complaint [#3] is moot and is DENIED.

The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for the admission pro hac vice of Philip K Berg and Lawrence J Joyce are IN ABEYANCE until the Court has had the opportunity, in open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they have signed.

It’s basically over. Berg and Joyce are not credentialed and pro hac vice means on this occasion only. The Court is not going to allow them to do anything. Not that it wasn’t over before it started. Once barry and biden met with the Supreme Court justices it was over. The question is why no one cares that the Supreme Court clearly prejudiced themselves…except for Justice Alito. Now that is a conversation I would like to have.

Hollister v Soetoro original filing

barry’s motion to dismiss

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.