September 10, 2009
Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
Rundown of Taitz hearing
Orly Taitz post-court interview (Pt 1)
Orly Taitz post-court interview (Pt 2)
Orly Taitz post-court interview (Pt 3)
Orly Taitz post-court interview (Pt 4)
This is barry’s defense team’s motion to dismiss. It is very familiar but has a few twists. First off it follows the old mantra: bury them with paper…55 pages worth. Second: make it look good – which, let’s face it – next to Orly Taitz’s filings is not difficult to do.
It amazes me with all the general support, volunteers and lawyerly advice that she can’t hire one eagle-eyed paralegal who can write/type the motions in her – yes, her – sleep. And why she can’t hire some fresh-faced kid out of law school who understands the basic rules of court filings and a veteran process server to handle the subpoenas.
Forget the people setting up TV/Radio/internet interviews. That needs to stop. This is serious business now and Judge Carter deserves the respect of proper filings and court etiquette. She also needs another lawyer on the case to mediate between her and Kreep – as in physically – and who can put a little shock collar on her wrist to zap when she starts off on her tangents and/or bullies the judge.
Anyway. Third is use the latest/last court judgments to make their case. There are plenty – though the best decision still remains Judge Surrick’s out of Philly who heard Phil Berg’s original – the first of all – case. He said no citizen has standing and that only Congress could do something about it but it would require a new law. He also stated that barry was “excessively vetted” but didn’t go so far as Judge Robertson’s”raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and massaged” rant.
Nobody reads this shit and I’m tired of explaining it so read the scribd if you’re interested.
Provided by Tesibrio
