September 14, 2009
Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
Rhodes v MacDonald delayed until Monday (video)
Rhodes v MacDonald defense motion to dismiss
Capt Rhodes affidavit re: missed hearing [Scribd]
Rhodes v MacDonald: Minutes (9-14)
Rhodes v MacDonald: Judge Land’s ruling (9-16)
Rhodes v MacDonald Dismissed [Scribd]
Taitz: Judge Land “should be tried for treason with Obama“
Rhodes v MacDonald: Emergency Request for Stay of Deployment
Rhodes v MacDonald: Filing errors
Rhodes v MacDonald: Stay denied, possible $10K Taitz sanction
Capt Rhodes to Judge Land: Taitz acted without her permission
The hearing was 90 minutes.
No video.
Judge Clay Land will have decision by NOON WEDNESDAY. (9-16)
Evidently Orly Taitz did her usual off-subject rambling about barry being a usurper and the ebay Kenyan Birth Certificate. Don’t know if she got as far as the 100 Social Security numbers and 100 addresses or whatever else.
Here’s a glimpse of the back and forth as provided by CHUCK WILLIAMS Ledger-Enquirer.
JUDGE LAND:
Whenever I give you a minute, you go off on these talking points.
ORLY TAITZ:
We have not seen Mr. Obama’s birth certificate.
JUDGE LAND:
This is not a forum to lay ground work for a press conference. This is a court of law.
Guess he’s watched her post-hearing press conferences. I wonder if he saw the one in California last week? And I wonder if he’s been on her website – though that is such a mess there’s not much to be gained except insight into why Taitz is the way she is.
The judge pointed out that burden fell on Rhodes because she sought the restraining order to stop her deployment.
Background:
March 2005: Rhodes received her officer’s commission
2006-2007: Finished last two years of medical school (which she has to pay back with active duty)
June 2007: Started her internship at Army Hospitals – doesn’t say what specialty.
June 2008: Began two year active duty commitment.
It doesn’t makes sense. She’s being sent over there after one year of clinical work? Maybe the Army has a MASH type internship specific to folks being sent to war zones. Doesn’t make sense if it was a general internship where she rotated to different specialties. Guess that demonstrates how desperate things must be. A well-trained, battled-tested medic can do more on the battlefield than a one-year general rotation intern whose only experience is in a quiet, well-lit, climate-controlled hospital.
The questions to Capt Rhodes seemed to center on whether she had a problem being deployed in general.
Would she be fighting deployment if it were Sen McCain as president?
No.
George Bush?
No.
Has she disobeyed or not obeyed any order given by barry this far?
No.
Taitz asked why does she have to prove the authenticity of the eBay Kenyan Birth certificate when the Army doesn’t have to prove barry has an authentic one.
JUDGE LAND:
Who has the burden of establishing that the president of the United States is not eligible to serve in his office?
Who indeed?
It’s not a matter of proving barry is NOT ELIGIBLE.
It’s a matter of barry proving he IS ELIGIBLE:
He sought the office and he has yet to provide proof he is eligible to hold the Office.
The DNC was to certify he met the requirements and Pelosi signed two different documents.
Why doesn’t Taitz explore that angle?
Forget that damn birth certificate.
We all know that birth certificate is a fraud if she hasn’t submitted an affidavit from the hospital administrator to back it up.
And where are all the bots?
All they could come up was the dates – which they were unable to completely change in Wiki as much as they tried. They forgot the map – Kenya stands out in purple as in they use both mm/dd & dd/mm.
From Judge Land’s question, it’s clear he is going to rule that Capt Rhodes has no standing because she cannot define a direct injury.
Yo Orly – raise the question/prove that the DNC never officially proved barry WAS Constitutionally eligible.
Get a hold of J Riggs and get the original documents and walk in there and show the judge.
As proven by the Hawaii Official Certification of Nomination, the onus was on the DNC to prove barry was eligible as in: “the following candidates for President and Vice President are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution”
The DNC has to show exactly how they proved he was Constitutionally eligible like they officially certified him to be.
Subpoena the DNC records as to how they made the judgment he was Constitutionally eligible. If they used that COLB – fine. Make them produce an actual physical copy. Then make them go on record in a court of law that they believe him to be eligible and what they used to make that determination. Then make Pelosi explain why there were two different forms when one could cover all.
Bottom line: You don’t have to PROVE HE IS INELIGIBLE if he was never definitively PROVEN ELIGIBLE.
