Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
Rhodes v MacDonald delayed until Monday (video)
Rhodes v MacDonald defense motion to dismiss
Rhodes v MacDonald ruling due Wed noon
Capt Rhodes affidavit re: missed hearing [Scribd]
Rhodes v MacDonald: Minutes (9-14)
Rhodes v MacDonald: Judge Land’s ruling (9-16)
Rhodes v MacDonald Dismissed [Scribd]
Taitz: “[Judge Land] should be tried for treason with Obama“
Rhodes v MacDonald: Filing errors
Rhodes v MacDonald: Stay denied, possible $10K Taitz sanction
Capt Rhodes to Judge Land: Taitz acted without her permission
I do not understand why Taitz filed on something that could never have been won and should not even been brought to hearing. Judge Land dismissed the case because he had to. Because the Court is not authorized to rule on the matter of Capt Rhodes (or anyone else’s) deployment.
Period. End of story. No reconsideration of any sort is going to change that and a judge that hostile even if there were a chance would have not allowed it.
And the worst part is Capt Rhodes, who is going to be deployed, now has to worry about how she is going to pay the defense’s court costs. I hope someone stays on that story. They make Capt Rhodes pay, that will show how scummy barry is.
If Taitz was going to do anything she should have tried humble and asked the judge to withdraw that part of the ruling.
Instead she claimed that Capt Rhodes was denied her Fifth Amendment right to due process because she was denied an opportunity to address the defenses’ motion to dismiss. And in an incredible feat of circular logic – that Capt Rhodes had no meaningful access to the courts because Land’s ruling didn’t address any of her arguments.
He didn’t address the plaintiffs arguments because there was no need to because the Court is not authorized to interfere with military deployment.
And she writes this:
Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United State District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to the same political pressure, external control, and most likely, subservience to the illegitimate chain of command, which plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President of the United States in not even nominally the Commander in Chief of the Artilce III Judiciary.
Does that sound like anything a soldier would allow to be written, especially after she lost and knows she’s going to Iraq?
And it seems barry sr was guilty of treason too.
It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a president who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography, such as the obvious fact that his father was an (admittedly disloyal and possibly treacherous) subject of the British Crown when he was born, even though this fact alone would disqualify the president as a ‘natural born citizen,’ regardless of his place of birth.
And then there’s the usual:
….anti-American, authoritarian, neo-Facistic, Palaeo-Communist dictatorship…
Click top right for full screen.
Courtesy of Jack Ryan.
-
