September 18, 2009
updated
Updated birth certificate posts
Two different 2008 DNC OCONs
OCONs: Gore, Kerry, 2008 Hawaii, 2008 South Carolina
Comparison of HI & non-HI OCON forms for Gore, Kerry, barry
Hey Kyle.
It took me awhile but I finally figured out what bothered me about the Hawaii forms that Citizen Riggs provided. They’re not stamped. There’s a suggestion of something on the top left on both the Hawaii Democratic Party or the DNC Official Certification of Nomination (OCON). But it’s nothing like the other stamps that were perfectly clear. I emailed Riggs to find out why. [Also asked him what states the 2000-2004 forms were from.]
The other thing is why EXACTLY did Hawaii need the extra clause?
Again, I don’t know how long Hawaii has required it but from the consistent typos, I would imagine it was just this year. Will update this later when I find out for sure.
The reason I’m wondering is because of the Hawaii Democratic Party’s OCON is dated the 27th. Makes sense because the states had to have theirs in for the roll call so the DNC could do theirs on the 28th.
Wouldn’t you like to know if one was ever typed up with Hillary Clinton’s name on it – JOKE. It’s clear that it’s an all male form.
But the wording of the form is:
…LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE under the PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTIES BALLOTING AT THE PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE POLL AND CAUCUS held on Feb 19th, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by the acclamation…AT THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION…
[Another typo: "Parties" should be "Party's"]
So what are those provisions?
I wonder if Riggs has a copy of those. I just looked on Scribd again and didn’t see anything new.
Are all the caucuses called “Presidential Poll and Caucus” or just HI?
Do they all have the same provisions?
Does it include the eligibility clause?
Is it another standard form or does it vary state to state?
It goes back to who certified him as eligible to go on the ballots in the first place.
If we assume that HI is the only state that needs that extra clause – then it means the other 49 don’t.
So what do the other 49 go on?
Does the DNC send something out to whoever is responsible for sending the ballot names to the printer saying the Democratic candidates are eligible?
Do the Secretaries of each State receive a standard form from the DNC certifying as eligible the candidates BEFORE the names go on?
I still do not know what happens and who certifies what (if anything) before the names get placed on the primary ballots. That crazy Communist (not that One) the one from Nicaragua got his name on ballots in this election and last and nobody cared.
Do the candidates sign anything in the individual states?
Did barry ever sign anything saying he was Constitutionally eligible?
If so, was it before or after that COLB showed up?
If so, did he have to provide any tangible evidence or just a signature?
Was there a box – will provide proof on demand?
If he did say he was Constitutionally eligible in a state BEFORE he put up that worthless COLB – that state should be able to request a COLB hardcopy to put with their records. Of course, it’s not going to change the state’s vote but it should allow them to ask for it, which is all that’s needed.
I do not understand why folks keep searching for the Holy Grail in Kenya, Hawaii or in the courts when all that’s needed is to prove that COLB is a fake.
Bottom line:
49 states did not need that clause
13 of those 49 states had caucuses that evidently were enough that they didn’t require that clause.
Hawaii, a caucus state, needed that extra clause for what reason?
To provide a back up for barry’s “vital records”?
