Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland

September 27, 2009

Polanski/Goldberg/rape posts/videos
Ms Goldberg: “It wasn’t rape rape” (video/text)
Ms Goldberg, what is “rape rape”?

Roman Polanski, 76, was arrested by Swiss officials when he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award. (His wife Sharon Tate was murdered by the “Manson family” when she was 8 months pregnant.) He had an outstanding arrest warrant from 1978 for giving drugs and alcohol and then raping a 13-year-old girl he (44) said was “experienced” and consented. He’s been hiding out in France. One wonders if the “outraged” Zurich Film Festival officials were in on it. The girl now woman had asked the case be dropped earlier this year because of the intrusion by the press every time something happens with him. Did they ask her or even notify her before they arrested him?

One Response to “Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland”

  1. mattie14 Says:

    Hello Mr Lord.

    Quite frankly, I am disgusted with the ignorance of your words.

    He didn’t “have sex with her”.

    He forced himself on her and raped her.

    “Having sex” implies consent.

    The age of consent in California is 18.

    He was 44 she was 13.

    He was charged with unlawful sex with a minor.

    Unlawful sex with a minor = statutory rape.

    Statutory rape = rape.

    He was charged with rape.

    He admitted to raping her and giving her drugs to facilitate it.

    What planet are you from where you think a 44 y/o man can “have sex” with a 13 y/o?

    And how in the hell was “he still was made responsible for this…”?

    He has not been held responsible for any of it. He fled like the cowardly rapist he is.

    And even if he were made responsible for “this” – he cannot undo what he did to her when he raped her.

    And because he has not been held responsible for raping a 13 y/o girl – that girl now woman is the one who suffers each time this is brought back up.

    He is hurting her all over again because he is such a coward.

    What mother wants her teenage sons to know what happened to her – especially what he did to her?

    That’s why she sought to dismiss the case against him – so all the disgusting details aren’t brought back up and so the media will leave her alone.

    I am no longer a 13-year-old child. I have dealt with the difficulties of being a victim, have surmounted and surpassed them with one exception.

    Every time this case is brought to the attention of the Court, great focus is made of me, my family, my mother and others. That attention is not pleasant to experience and is not worth maintaining over some irrelevant legal nicety, the continuation of the case

    .

    He should rot in hell.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.