Rhodes: Taitz requests Judge Land recuse himself

October 3, 2009

Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits

Rhodes: Taitz requests extension to respond to sanction

Orly Taitz is undaunted. When all else fails ask the judge to recuse himself.  She appeared in court Friday before Judge Land and not only asked for an extension to prove why she shouldn’t be sanctioned $10K, she asked Judge Land to recuse himself on the basis of personal contacts and financial stakes he may have with barry. Note: Judge Land was appointed by President Bush

Reasons for recusal:

Circumstantial evidence Judge Land may have had extra-judicial, ex-parte contacts with the barry administration – in particular Eric Holder. Exhibit A is an affidavit concerning Holder’s visit to Columbus GA,

Judge Land’s stock disqualified because of equity ownership of certain securitites (Microsoft, Comcast) which are aligned politically and economically with barry.

The primary reason for the undersigned counsel to file this motion to recuse, however, is that Judge Clay D. Land has by his own actions created a constitutionally intolerable situation in which he is both complaining party, prosecuting attorney, judge and jury regarding the charges of frivolous filing and sanctionable conduct which he has leveled…

Then there’s a discussion of contempt, penalty, politics, law, birther agenda, Thurgood Marshall and civil rights.

The tenor of this Court’s orders and the rapidity of their rendition both support the inference that the Court has a deep-seated prejudice and bias toward counsel, and that such bias, because of its very nature and substance is extra-judicial in origin…

Since the undersigned certainly did not invent or ever adopt the term “birther”, awareness of this label is a pejorative appellation (often coupled with even more colorful epithets such as “batshit crazy”), and since she does not go around introducing herself or her clients as part of a ‘movement’ in any sense, certainly not in court, it can only be concluded that Judge Clay D. Land has derived his information, and prejudice, and bias, against the undersigned by reference to material which is exclusively available from extrajudicial sources.

Violation of the First, Fifth and Ninth Amendments.

Prejudiced against Capt Rhodes as an individual questioning the Constitutional legitimacy of the chain of command, didn’t read the complaint and may have been guided by another hand.

“Blitzkrieg-like rulings…produces a result so bizarre as to flunk the “reasonable jurist” standard.

I would have liked to see his face as he read this. The writer sounds like someone new compared to her other filings.

Click top right for full screen

Thanks again to Jack Ryan

View this document on Scribd

=========