October 5, 2009
Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
Judge Carter: Minutes (Oct 5)
Judge Carter: NO ruling (Oct 6)
Barnett v Obama hearing:Tatiz (Oct 7)
Judge Carter: NO ruling (Oct 7)
Ex-parte Motion for Relief of Stay of Discovery (Oct 8)
Motion for Relief of Stay of Discovery: DENIED (Oct 8)
Status of Taitz’s case with Judge Carter (Oct 10)
Here’s a citizen report by WAVEYDAVEY on Taitz’s hearing (Barnett/Keyes v Obama) in Judge Carter’s court. It’s a lot more in depth than the report from last hearing.
UPDATE: Didn’t think “politijab” would have to be commented on since it can’t get much bigger. Here’s Taitz’s take.
====================
Interesting question by Judge Carter: Why do you want to depose Obama? He has no memory about his birth.
True. But he knows what’s on the birth certificate and he knows what’s on the COLB.
One nugget I wasn’t aware of: Taitz has an email from California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (Lightfoot v Bowen) stating that Bowen never checked barry’s eligibility before she ok’d his name for the ballot.
Carter said the Electoral College could have addressed it and the suits should have been filed then. And that he was going to make a finding that the opportunity was lost for the Electoral College to address it.
They were. Berg filed his at the end of September 2008.
He thinks it’s absurd if a mother’s location at birth renders her child ineligible to be president.
He was concerned about jurisdiction, standing, and process and what the process would be if he were to be removed from office.
Impeachment? 25th Amendment? Something else?
The Constitution gives sole power to Congress to remove the president from office as in impeachment or if he becomes incapacitated. All it takes is one senator to raise the issue. And because Congress has the power, the case is not justicable – as in cannot be decided on in the courts. DOJ also said it’s not a case for quo warranto but it’s not explained why.
Kreep said impeachment is not the way to go because he believes barry is not legally the president.
In case you’re wondering – yes, she brought up bin laden and barry’s gazillion Social security numbers. And at the end of an impassioned speech where she said it was not a political question but that of quo warranto she was cheered and applauded by the folks in the courtroom.
She also brought up her family – an uncle was sent to Siberia and eventually died, her aunt tried to kill herself despite having two children – as examples of citizens without rights.
Taitz mentioned that when she first heard barry speech she was horrified – the courtroom clapped – and then the judge spontaneously offered to the clappers that he had not experienced any pressure on making his decision. And added that the court gets 40-100 calls from Taitz folks, so if there has been any pressure it’s been from her, and he wants the phone calls to stop.
Plaintiffs – concerned about standing.
Defendants – concerned about justicability, jurisdiction, political question and how far do the courts go.
Audience – he said their applause did not influence him one way or the other.
This would have been interesting to witness. Gilda Radner would have made the perfect SNL and movie version Orly Taitz.
Why hasn’t SNL done an Orly sketch?
Click top right for full screen.
Thanks to JACK RYAN
—————–
