October 5, 2009upper
Updated birth certificate posts/videos/lawsuits
Update: I’m declaring this total BS. Eric Holder as described in the affidavit: “Well known TV displayed distinguishing characteristics: the trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and general olive complexion.
I am looking at Eric Holder on TV and he is anything but “not large of stature”. Mayor Daley only comes up to his shoulder and Arne Duncan who is 6’5″ has maybe 2″ on him. And what’s immediately striking about Holder is his thinning on top grayish hair contrasting with very dark eyebrows and mustache.
I’m sure there’s a way to find out Holder’s schedule but it doesn’t even matter. From Mr Douglas’ meager description of three traits – he got the most obvious one wrong. Unless there’s a typo that he didn’t mean to swear to – it DID NOT HAPPEN. It could not have been Eric Holder.
Judge Land is going to love this. One wonders if Taitz is just out to piss him off. Whether she considers it a well spent $10K that she can use down the road. She just better have had nothing to do with Mr Douglas’ affidavit.
=================
Now this is getting interesting…if true.
I think this is the most important development thus far, as it proves without a doubt that the US Government and number one US attorney (of the people I might add) know what is going down and were concerned enough for ERIC HOLDER to show up in person.
Remember that Major Cook’s deployment was withdrawn 2 days before the hearing was even held, which made moot the proceedings.
So why was ERIC HOLDER across the street from Judge Land’s courthouse the morning of the hearing?
It may explain why Judge Land has been such a complete unprofessional, why he bothered to have the Rhodes hearing when he knew the Court CANNOT interfere with the deployment process, why he ordered Capt Rhodes to pay the defendant’s court fees and why he has gone after Taitz in such an obviously personal way.
What’s the best way to discredit the birthers?
Discredit the “queen bee” of the “birther movement”.
What’s the best way to discourage active military from bringing more suits?
Connect them to the queen bee and then make them pay court fees.
It never made sense that Judge Land held even a single hearing, when Capt Rhodes had already failed in Texas with the exact same case and Land had already ruled in Major Cook’s case so he had to be aware that the COURT CANNOT INTERFERE with deployment orders.
But if one is trying to discredit the birthers as publicly as possible and discourage the military?
Not hard to do when one has the firm support (or command) from the US Attorney General.
Anyway.
On the day of Major Cook’s hearing in Judge Land’s court, ERIC HOLDER was seen in a coffee shop directly across from the courthouse. The eyewitness account was entered as Exhibit A in Orly Taitz’s request for Judge Land to recuse himself.
According to the affidavit below, Robert D. Douglas, of Alma, GA was with his wife, his wife sister and her husband waiting for the court to open so they could attend Maj Cook’s hearing. Mr Douglas states that he was seated, facing and watching the front door, approximately 8-12 feet away, when he saw ERIC HOLDER walk in. Douglas said he “immediately recognized” him and then pointed him out to the others present and they all agreed it was Attorney General of the US, ERIC HOLDER.
Mr Douglas surmised that since HOLDER was alone, he must have thought he could get by unrecognized. He also said HOLDER was not present in open court, but he didn’t say where he thought HOLDER came from or if he watched him walk into or out of the courthouse.
What’s needed is testimony from someone who can place HOLDER inside the courthouse – surveillance tapes would be optimal – and whether someone can place him in Judge Land’s chambers.
Check out videos HERE, HERE of Taitz’s press conferences outside the courthouse. You’ll see that it is not a highly trafficked area. Follow update link at top for Cook and Rhodes cases, if needed.
DOUGLAS’ affidavit:
Red flags went up immediately in my mind and the questions remain, as yet. Why does the attorney general of the United States need to be present in an obscure hearing well off his beaten path? Could it possibly be, since Holder did not present himself in open court, he may have had a little ‘whisper in the ear’ to a federal judge in order to bias his judicial vision and adhere to the president’s agenda of obstruction?
Only Judge Clay D Land can answer those questions.
Click top right for fill screen. Will probably need to zoom since it’s in italics.
Thanks to JACK RYAN
=============
