Baucus: banning ED coverage for sex offenders “is not a serious amendment”

March 25, 2010

Democrats voted against the GOP (Sen/Dr Tom Coburn – OK) amendment to ban ED drug coverage for sex offenders (57-42).

Why wasn’t it in the first version?

This amendment also prohibits coverage of Viagra and other ED medications to convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders, and prohibits coverage of abortion drugs

The second half of the sentence is why they rejected it.

COBURN:

The vast majority of Americans don’t want their taxpayer dollars paying for this kind of drug for those kind of people.

The vast majority hope ED drugs never get in the hands of sex offenders.

Sen Max Baucus (D-MT) had a different take. He doesn’t think ED drugs and sex offenders are a big deal and finds the amendment a “mockery” and a ‘crass political stunt”.

BAUCUS:

This is a serious bill. This is a serious debate. The amendment offered by the senator from Oklahoma makes a mockery of the Senate, the debate and the American people. It is not a serious amendment. It is a crass political stunt aimed at making 30-second commercials, not public policy.

Wonder how he would feel after being raped for 30 hours?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.