July 22, 2010
Jake, here’s a single quote – full post with video here. The rest are well documented with video/transcript, which is why I use CNN. Please follow link above to find what you need. I’ve had more than enough of this media farce. It’s like the primaries all over again. Mr Grand Uniter’s numbers drop…everybody’s a racist. Probably won’t have to attack the birther…depending on how much Ms Sherrod reveals about the – yes – WH involvement.
Put down the bong for a minute and imagine if it were President Bush…would anyone NOT be blaming him for the firing?
Double Standard in a nutshell.
Palin’s ‘refudiate’ has a little logic to it but what in the hell are “reverse racism” & “white racism”? Prejudice is prejudice, which by definition, should apply to everyone equally. All is wrong or nothing is wrong. Google Look around and see who uses them. Those who do interpret “racism” as Racism = whiteys ->> blacks. There’s no need to even read on unless you want to rebut them…but how is logic going to change a definition in their head?
Why don’t folks see the madness in all this? What is it going to take? Even the KOS SACKS have turned on barry…a subpoena for that worthless “birth certificate” perhaps?
Mr Transparency is not allowing Ms Cook to tell her tale. Ms Rogers 2.o. A tale Ms Sherrod vouched for – to the point of saying on AC 360 that if it were Ms Cook’s decision it never would have happened. And, not at all curiously, again, it’s another whitey [PC: who one can reasonably assume is] standing by Ms Sherrod’s account while “The First Black President” fired her and the president of the NAACP condemned her…both without ever speaking to her.
The truth lies in what hurts the most. And unless Ms Sherrod reveals her truths concerning this issue in a public forum on video — someone simply asking would be interesting in itself — the American People will never know.
Imagine the teaching moment if she were to admit [again] that the NAACP caused the situation, that the WH was directly involved and she was following the partyline with her attack on Mr Breitbart. Those confused folks might even write that the teachable moment was about that there “reverse racism”.
Zero tolerance for discrimination should also mean zero tolerance for silence.
Who knows. Though calling potential reconcilees ‘racists’ and taking about defamation suits while touting ones message of reconciliation is not exactly believable.
One wonders if Ms Sherrod truly understands the meaning of “defamation” and that it is not unidirectional.
One also wonder if she is truly not angry with the NAACP’s treatment of herself – why she isn’t angry with how Mr Jealous characterized her listeners’ behavior as “disturbing” when all it was was “testifying”? Cue stock footage of black reverend explaining how whiteys don’t understand black churches….seems Mr Jealous could use a refresher.
But the WH does deserve major props for staying the course with the AZ immigration agitation – nothing like a politically expedient generated crisis – where’s Emanuel been? so the barry soetoro birth certificate bill won’t have a chance of passing.
FYI, in AZ it’s racist (isn’t everything nowadays?) to ask a potential employee to prove he is eligible for the highest office in the land as stipulated by the highest law of the land. And AZ legislators, sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, think it’s racist to enact a law whose only purpose is to make sure the Constitution is followed.
At times, I truly believe there must be a parallel universe – barry’s and reality – because I cannot understand how folks fall for this stuff. I no longer wonder why the German people had to see, smell and touch the skeletal once-humans whose ashes had not yet dusted their crop and whose flesh they had yet to smell burning. They has to see it in the flesh – to experience it as real and undeniable to override their propagandized mind. And even then some refused to believe.
Anyway. Ms Sherrod’s mission of reconciliation has thus far been punctuated by her declaration that the Tea Party, FOX News, and Andrew Breitbart are racists, as well as “the conservative racist people” Breitbart’s deals with.
Whoever he’s dealing with she has no more talked to than he, the WH or the NAACP did to her.
Here Ms Sherrod calls Mr Breitbart a “lie/liar” and blames him for the hate calls/hate mail she received. Man this dude sure has wicked superpowers, don’t he? And we’re to believe none of the “hate mail” came from angry co-workers, angry blacks who had taken NAACP’s condemnation of her at face value and/or angry barry supporters who come all shapes and sizes and sexual orientation?
Though one particular orientation continues to be subjected to the “institutional racism” of the US military with the full and complete knowledge (and intentional lack of action) by the Commander in Chief.
One for all and all for one! Not.
The hierarchy of prejudice is clear.
And only one ism matters.
Secy Clinton and Sarah Palin were not treated in a sexist way and barry’s main attack against Senator McCain had nothing to do with ageism. They’re all whiteys and everyone knows how whiteys can’t be discriminated against.
Finally arrived where I started out going.
John King asks what Ms Sherrod would say to Mr Breitbart if she had 30 seconds.
Perhaps you can tell me what step this is in the “reconciliation process”.
KING: Miss Sherrod, if you had 30 seconds with Andrew Breitbart, what would you say?
SHERROD: I’d tell him he’s a liar [lie]. He knew exactly what effect that would have on not only – he knew what effect that would have on the conservative racist people he’s dealing with.
That’s why I started getting the hate mail, and that’s why I started getting the hate calls. He got the effect he was looking for.
How does Ms Sherrod know what effect he was looking for? How is calling Mr Breitbart a lie/liar not a hateful statement? Because it wasn’t a phone call or email?
Gotta say, this Mr Breitbart has some remarkable powers…able to leap tall buildings, take over the internet, twist the minds of folks who can’t decipher a video for themselves (her message was included in the video at the very end) and capable of snookering and deceiving an organization that defends blacks unjustly accused by whiteys and prides itself on integrity.
It would be comical but for the subject matter.
Why would the NAACP, MSM, WH and Ms Sherrod give so much power to an “obviously racist” man who deals with all those monolithic anonymous whitey racist conservatives? Cue stock footage of the crazy ladies in red or last summer’s townhalls about something that won’t even take full effect until barry’s out of office. Do you know how healthcare is saving us billions or is it trillions now? when it doesn’t even exist?
What is RNC Chairman Michael Steele saying about this? What are NAACP members saying about Mr Jealous’ rush to judgment of them and Ms Sherrod? Is anyone calling for his resignation like folks are with Secy Vilsack?
None of it makes sense. Not that it matters.
Do you know why Facebook deleted Sarah Palin’s Ground Zero mosque post.