What Dr Fukino’s statement didn’t say

Updated list of birth certificate posts
Dr Fukino’s statement #2

February 3, 2009

Extracted this from a previous post (birth certificate Update 2) to go with the new post: Why can’t just the known COLB be subpoenaed?

As far as I know, Dr Fukino has never amended or added to her original statement below.

10-31-08 Statement by Director of Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino:

There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate.

State law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

1-Original birth certificate present.

2-On file in accordance with state policies.

3-Does not mention what was on it.

4-Does not mention his place of birth.

5-Does not mention proof that barry requested his COLB or if so how many times and when.

6-Does not mention if his family requested barry’s COLB or his original long form or if so how many times and when.

7-Does not mention how long the birth certificate has been on file.

8-Does not mention any of the pertinent information: hospital, doctor, name and DOB, etc.

9-Does not mention any proof that a COLB was in fact derived from the exact original birth certificate she verified.

10-Does not provide chain of evidence proof that the COLB on factcheck was derived from the original birth certificate.

11-Does not prove in any way that the factcheck COLB – that very one – was indeed derived from the long form she verified.

To do so, she would need both in her hand at the same time and records proving one lead to the other one and that no alterations of any sort were made.

Conclusion:

The COLB provided on factcheck has not – by Dr Fukino’s statement – been proven to be an exact legal representation of what was on the exact long form birth certificate she verified.

So how is factcheck’s COLB admissible in a court of law as absolute proof?

***

What barry has not released
COLB vs long form birth certificate
Why can’t the known COLB be subpoenaed?

Dr Ron Polarik COLB forgery findings (Video)
Copy of COLB

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s