July 1, 1009
Here’s the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Scribd document. We never covered this one. Mario Apuzzo (New Jersey) is the lawyer and the case focuses on violations of the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth and Twentieth Amendments. Same question: Constitutional eligibility via natural born citizen. Retired military Charles F. Kerchner. Jr (CDR USNR) and Donald H. Nelsen, Jr (Marine Reserves and National Army Guard) claim standing through the hypothetical in a national disaster…recall possible…would barry’s orders be Constitutional…would they be violating their military oath, hiding other records, paying large sums to fight cases…why? Same birth certificate questions: COLB vs birth certificate, forgery, Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan, no known Hawaiian hospital. He also goes into the media’s lack of vetting [wonder if Judge Robertson got a copy] and then lists the levels of non-vetting from the DNC through to Dick Cheney and Nancy Pelosi.
Same problem: standing. Like Col Hollister, the retired military’s injury is only hypothetical. And irreparable harm would not be limited to them.
It actually reads like a sane lawyer wrote it — neutral and logical – and proofread.
Complaint for Emergency Injunction, Declaratory Relief, Mandamus, and Petition for Quo Warranto
Federal District Court of New Jersey – Now Camden
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-00253
Mario Apuzzo for Kerchner, Patterson, LeNormand, and Nelsen
Barack Hussein Obama II, USA, US Congress, US Senate, US House of Representatives, Richard B. Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi.
- Jan 21, 2009, filed an Amended Complaint for Emergency Injunction, Declaratory Relief, Mandamus, and Petition for Quo Warranto.
- Feb 9 – filed a Second Amended Verified Complaint.
- Feb 17 – Defendants served.
Two updates to follow.
Click top right for FULL SCREEN.