February 10, 2010
You’re absolutely correct. I had enough of the birth certificate issue and legal documents and Taitz’s machinations. I appreciate what you’ve sent me and will post what I can find. Why don’t you start a blog? It’s not that complicated.
I have birther lover’s Dave Weigel’s just happened to be passing by version of the “conversation” between Joseph Farah and Andrew Breitbart at the Tea Party Convention. Breitbart was not happy about Farah’s mention of the birth certificate issue when he really should have been upset about the length (40 minutes) not content. And there are at least three other things I promised to post for someone else that I realize now I never did.
Video: February 6
Carl Swensson, Citizens Grand Jury,
Faith, Family and Freedom Kickoff
Georgia Christian Alliance
Sand Springs, Georgia
Interviewee is Rep Nathan Deal (R-GA) who wrote a letter to barry back in December asking that he clear up the birth cetificate issue. See here for background. Receipt of letter was confirmed by the WH – GANNET TSEGGAI- but as far as I know this is the first time the contents have been mentioned publicly and it is certainly the first time on video.
barry has never responded…other than his arrogant comment at the Prayer breakfast.
Curiously, Deal has not signed on to Rep Posey’s bill – probably because he is running for governor and thus won’t be around much longer. But it works to his advantage as a candidate, because, as he claims, he just wants to know where he can refer his constituents to to find definitve answers.
I can’t state this as a fact, but I think all it takes is one member of the House or the Senate to begin quo warranto proceedings, which it seems is the only way – short of barry volunteering the info – to compel him to produce it. And from what I remember, in the Hawaii version of the FOIA, there was a statute that should have compelled the DOH to release his birth certificate when it was questioned. I’m not sure if it hinged on who questioned it – like if it only applied to the Hawaii Democrat Party of the DNC, neither of which would have been interested. Don’t quote me on these. I’ll need to check them out or maybe someone can comment.
Haven’t heard back on my 4th FOIA request since they changed the website. I don’t know what happened to Miss Tickly/Terri. She was definitely on to something with the registrar thing but last I knew she was going down the avenue that barry was a Hawaiian prince or something. Aha that’s it. A women running for office on Oklahoma (Hawaii born) has released her son’s long form birth certificate…from 1981. I haven’t examined it – but I was wondering if they had a finite number of choices for race. Like a check box. No one in Hawaii could give me an answer, including the Honolulu ask a librarian.
The absolute key to all this, without involving Hawaii, is the November 1981 UPI article that MICHAEL ANDERSON referred to on MYBARACKOBAMA. It was used as the source of barry’s birth certificate in reference to him being only 8 when Ayers was a confirmed domestic terrorist. The date of the post was October 5, 2008 – a little less than 4 months after that digital image COLB was placed online by Kos – and there is no link to this article.
Why would they not refer to the “document” that they swear proves barry was born in Hawaii?
Because it was based on FACTCHECK’s April 17, 2008 post where it was enough for a fact check of barry’s age. So why would they go to such extremes to use the COLB that appeared 2 months after they used the UPI article to confirm barry’s birth certificate?
it was good for the one factcheck – why wasn’t it good for another?
UPI was one of the sites that changed barry’s birthplace after the Kapiolani letter was exposed. Their November 4th article said “Queens Medical Center” and they blamed it on a student mistake but couldn’t explain why, after eight months, with no intervening revelation, they changed it to Kapiolani — within 90 minutes or so of WNDs post – as did Snopes.
As for your last question – I don’t know what his sister’s title is or if they’re living in the WH or if her husband got a job but barry’s mother-in-law is a permanent resident. i don’t know the rules about that.
SWENSSON: Last question I’d like to ask you has to do with the letter you sent to Barack Hussein Obama. [can’t hear] Have you receive any response back from him concerning that letter?
REP DEAL: No. No I have not.
SWENSSON: Has enough time past where you would be willing to let people see the contents of that?
REP DEAL: Well, I think that it is a communication that deserves, at least, his response, first of all, I think, which we have not received.
But, in essence, what I told him is this, is that: When I am asked a congressman, from constituents, hard questions, I don’t shy away from hard questions. I try to answer those questions. If I don’t have the information to answer the questions, I have to go to the folks who do have the answers. In this case, I think the president is the one who could clear this up.
What I’m asking him to do is tell me where I can ask my constituents to go to see authentic documentation that he says is authentic that will satisfy their curiosity.
I think that… [can’t hear]
I know that some folks are trying to label this as “politically incorrect”. I want to tell you something: Political incorrectness is paralyzing our society.
These kinds of things deserve straightforward responses – and I think this ought to be put to rest.
I’m not questioning his legitimacy to serve as the president.
I would think that he would like to clear that up in as unequivocal fashion as possible.
And that’s simply all I’m asking him to do.