AZ birth certificate bill passes first hurdle

February 25, 2010

Updated

Birth certificate posts
Passes second hurdle (Apr 19)
Birther bill critics: Rep Sinema, SoS Bennett

And that’s probably as far as it’s going to get.

Arizona State Rep Judy Burges (R-Skull Valley) introduced a bill (along with 39 other Republicans) back in January that would require the presidential/VP candidates to submit an affidavit and sufficient documents to prove they meet the Constitutional requirements for the Office of the Presidency. The documents would then be scrutinized by the Secy of State. If  s/he is not satisfied, then the candidate’s name can be withheld from the ballot.

In other words, useless digital images of something not vouched for by Hawaii and separate versions of the Certifications of Nomination will no longer be sufficient.

HB 2441 amends Statute 16-507 [compare], which deals with the placing of presidential candidates’ names on the ballot.

1-Party must provide the Secretary of State with written notice of their nomination for Pres/VP:

2-The candidate himself must swear to his (no need for her) eligibility and the Party has to back it up with actual documents – not digital images and 48 year-old birth notices .

3-The Secretary of State would then review the submitted documentation and if s/he has “reasonable cause” to believe things aren’t kosher then s/he can withhold the name from the ballot. Something not included in Rep Posey’s (R-FL) bill.

HB 2441 FULL TEXT

AMENDMENT SUMMARY: [emphasis added]

Requires that written notice from a national political party committee for a presidential candidate that is entitled to representation on the ballot be sent to the Arizona Secretary of State (Secretary), that contains the party’s nomination of candidates for president and vice-president.

States that within 10 days of the submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate which states the candidate’s citizenship and age.

Stipulates that presidential candidate affidavit include documents that prove:

  • That the candidate is a natural born citizen.
  • That the candidate’s age.
  • That the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in the United States Constitution.

States that the Secretary shall not place that candidate’s name on the ballot if upon review of the affidavit and other documents submitted pursuant to this Act, the Secretary believes the candidate does not meet the citizenship, age and residency requirements prescribed by law.

Makes a technical change.

Doesn’t detail “reasonable cause” or what documents serve as “proof”. Will be the focus of voting no.

Passed 2-22-10 in the House Subcommittee on Government by a vote of 6-1 (2 absent).

Now it’s up to the House proper – 90 members.

[Comprehensive or brief explanation of how a bill becomes law in AZ.]

Only one Democrat had the courage to show up and vote on record.

Member
Vote Member
Vote Member
Vote
Frank Antenori Y Chad Campbell N Tom Chabin
AB
Adam Driggs Y David Gowan Y Warde Nichols Y
Anna Tovar AB Steve Montenegro Y Judy Burges Y

Why would anyone vote no?

Really.

Why would Democrats vote no when the US Senate thought it necessary to pass a non-legally binding resolution declaring Arizona Senator John McCain a natural born citizens?

Why wouldn’t they want to keep foreign-born felons off the ballot, like Nicaraguan-born Socialist Roger Calero?

Empirically, it makes no sense. They are lawmakers sworn to uphold the Constitution, which is exactly what this bill would ensure.

So why are they objecting?

It only make sense if they know with certainty that a specific presidential candidate would not be able to provide sufficient proof to pass the Secretary of State’s sniff test.

And since no one has declared their intention of running, it can only mean the incumbent…barry.

The Democrats behavior is absolute proof they know that the digital image COLB is bogus and that Nancy Pelosi committed fraud when she signed two different versions of the official certifications of nomination.

If little people in Arizona know – everyone in Congress knows.

And if by some miracle someone in the media were to ask the dissenting Democrats to justify their objections about a bill that is designed solely to safeguard the Constitution?

2 Responses to “AZ birth certificate bill passes first hurdle”

  1. mattie Says:

    Hi Azgo.

    Thanks for your thoughts. That commercial must be hysterical. Both of them have named Eric Holder in their lawsuits.

    Hope those HS bills pass.

    Not sure of your focus on Sen McCain?

    I have no candidate and this site is not affiliated with or endorsed by any candidate, political party, organization, group or movement.

    The issue of the birth certificate is not even close to being over. There are similar eligibility bills in other states.

  2. azgo Says:

    Hello,

    You ask, “So why are they objecting?”

    My guess would be that the Washington elite have a different mindset and a continuous abuse and ignorance when it comes to the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution and other laws of the U.S.

    The voters of Arizona will send Mr. McCain down the road.

    I even wondering if he knows (or remembers) that he is named in the Kerchner et al v. Obama et al as a defendant. I’m wondering if any members of Congress were notified of this case. I asked the attorney Mario Apuzzo a few months back if each member of Congress was notified. He did not know. I wouldn’t put it past Obama and Holder to keep it to themselves.

    Here is what occurred during a Sun City Grand town hall meeting.

    ” McCain disagrees with audience member on a president’s birthplace ”

    ” McCain disagreed with an audience member who suggested presidential candidates as well as their parents should have to be born in the United States.

    McCain also questioned if being born in the United States should still be a requirement for presidential candidates.

    “If someone (was born elsewhere) and came here as a 1 year old, and served a productive life, I’m not sure,” McCain said. ”
    http://www.yourwestvalley.com/news/mccain-12040-disagrees-wexler.html

    McCain is a lawmaker and should know the law and its significance. This tells me that Mr. McCain would allow foreigners into the highest office of the country, which could already be the case.

    Our state legislature has introduced a bill to require high school students to complete two full years of U.S. history with one full semester just on the founding fathers of this country. Also two other separate bills require passing the national citizenship test to receive a drivers license and to graduate from high school.

    Have you seen McCain’s new campaign commercial debunking his opponent JD Hayworth for being a ‘birther’. The commercial includes Orly Taitz and Phillip Berg?

    Maybe this will and should become a big campaign issue here in Arizona between the candidates. We’ll see.

    Given all this, do you think Mr. McCain is in touch with the ‘little’ people of Arizona?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s