Is Hayworth a “birther” or not?

March 1, 2010

Birth certificate posts

Why does the media persist in saying the “birther” issue is resurfacing again when it has never left?

It never will until he produces his birth certificate.

Here the Brits have at it.

GREG MILAM from Sky News:

The ‘birthers’ are perhaps the most bizarre of the protest movements against the president.

He mentions REP BURGES’ birth certificate bill that passed out of committee and Sen McCain challenger JD HAYWORTH, who Milam calls “a champion of the so-called birthers’ movement”.

January 26th on Matthews, Hayworth said barry should come forward with the information.

Feb 17th on Campbell Brown, he said it was an identity theft issue not an esoteric argument about birth certificates and eligibility and that only the media was raising the question.

[Not sure why this video only sometimes loads. Here’s the link.]

Vodpod videos no longer available.

In this undated footage of Hayworth, he once again seems interested in the birth certificate issue.

HAYWORTH: Now we require voters to demonstrate they are who they say they are when they go to cast balllots. I think everyone on the ballot in Arizona should have to provide documentation.

Sen McCain is taking adavantage as well, linking Hayworth with Taitz and Berg.

MILAM puts the latest media spin on the ‘birther” issue: he’s not a citizen.

[Birthers] continue to question whether he was born in the United States at all and therefore whether he is legitimately president.

And then he says proof has been provided by Hawaii, which is another lie.

But authorities in Hawii have provided proof that Obama was born there.

The only “proof” provided is a digital image that Hawaii has said nothing about.

And of course he brings up race.

And in the video is Rep Kyrsten Sinema who was quoted in the initial story on Rep Burges’ bill. Sinema’s words then proved barry wouldn’t be able to produce proof that would pass the secy of state’s scrutiny should the bill pass.

SINEMA: This bill is what I would call patently ridiculous and also offensive. The truth is he is. He was born in the United States and he’s provided that proof time and time again.

The bill has nothing to do with barry. It is not retroactive. It would only matter in 2012.

And why would a lawmaker find any bill that ensures the integrity of the Constitution “ridiculous and offensive”?

For the record, barry has never produced a birth certificate of any sort. This article is so far off it says barry’s birth certificate was burnt in a fire.

MILAM: The White House has consistently dismissed the issue. Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama’s birth because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire, which wiped out much of the state’s archives.


Where did that whopper come from?

It’s like CNN making Dobbs read a statement that Hawaii isn’t able to produce a paper copy because they threw it away when they went electronic. A lie of course.

Don’t they realize how utterly ignorant they look calling “birthers” bizarre when they don’t even know the facts?

Same media propaganda. Whoever owns Sky News has been corrupted as well.

MILAM: The White House laughs off the birthers’ claim. But with crucial midterms elections 9 months away, the voices of protest are getting louder.

Meaning the media can’t ignore them with the elections coming up – nor can the politicians seeking re-election.

So why aren’t Democrats up for re-election hammering at the WH to release a copy so that issue is taken out of the campaign?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s